Tuesday, June 14, 2005

The ''Social Democratic'' Police State in Sweden





The ''Social'' MAN is still THE MAN

***

''... the democratic Republic is no more than a camouflaged form of bourgeois dictatorship. At the height of capitalism, when this represented a progressive factor, the bourgeoisie could allow itself the luxury of conceding a series of “democratic” liberties – considerably limited and full of conditions, because of its economical and political domination – to the working classes. Today in the imperialist era, “the final stage of capitalism”, the bourgeoisie, in order to overcome its internal contradictions, is forced to resort to the establishment of regimes of brutal dictatorship (fascism) which destroy even the paltry democratic liberties.''  - Andres Nin. (1937)

http://www.marxists.org/archive/nin/1937/06/polsit.htm

Not that Sweden is a democratic republic de-jure; although it acts like one (when it suits it) de facto.

***

I reference to the May 20, 2005 article about the ACLU lawsuit against the FBI ...

(http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/may2005/aclu-m20.shtml)

Kate Randall writes:

''...that the FBI and local police departments have engaged in intimidation tactics against human rights, civil liberties, antiwar and other advocacy groups based on political association...''

I would like to add that the dragnet extends beyond the U.S. border into Western Europe and that police forces here in Sweden are collaborating with U.S. police in the persecution of known anti-war activists, Arab immigrants and asylum seekers who are deemed to be ''anti-american''.

The tactic of the FBI is to manufacture phoney criminal charges and then obtain warrants from US judges that are forwarded via the U.S. Marshalls service (which handles extradition requests) to the U.S. Embassy in Stockholm. The Embassy then requests that the Swedish Justice Ministry order the police to place into custody the persons targeted. This is all related to 'Operation Falcon'. You reported about this a month ago.

(http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/apr2005/arr-a16.shtml)

👇👇👇

The Swedish Justice Ministry takes the warrants for granted. It simply carries out the arrests and turns the persons in question into U.S. custody. Persons targeted have no right to due process. The extradition hearings are a joke. The Swedish judges simply do as they are told.

This is happening now in Sweden as the society is still ''digesting'' Swedish secret service participation in the illegal ''rendition'' of two Arab asylum seekers who were detained by the CIA on Swedish territory. The two persons in question where simply kidnapped from the streets and flown to Syria and Egypt on the ''torture jet''. The ghost lear jet that the CIA is using to remove the targeted from Europe. It was allegedly photographed taking off from Arlanda airport in Stockholm by an independent journalist but airport security confiscated his camera and Swedish police had him arrested for ''criminal tresspassing''. The boy is in jail. The Swedish Justice Minister (a ''socialist'') recently said on TV that he agrees with ''rendition'' and that his policy is to collaborate with U.S. ''anti-terrorist'' efforts.

I know of one of those who has been targeted. He told police that it was not possible that he had ''warrants'' in the U.S. because he had never been there. Furthermore, Swedish police admit that they do not even have fingerprint or other evidence proving that the ''warrants'' in question apply to him. Still they want him to ''turn himself in'' for ''questioning''. He refused. He had to leave his home to remain safe. As far as he knows he is ''wanted''. The authorities ''suspended'' his residence permit (he is a foreigner).

Two years ago he succesfuly sued the Swedish police for brutality and ''won'' an official apology.

He was quite active with the anti-war movement in the city where he lived. The irony is that he was forced to leave his country of origin because he had been targeted by police there for his involvement in dissident activities while a student at a university there.

He feels he ended up crawling out of one repressive shit-hole to land in another.

We are witnessing the globalisation of the police state.

Wednesday, February 09, 2005

VOTE SOCIALIST IN 2004




[Election 2004: International Communist VOTE SOCIALIST Appeal to the Radical Socialist Community existing behind the USA Patriot Curtain. It was posted on left newsgroups on Yahoo! and on Indymedia San Francisco. It rejected voting for Kerry on anti-capitalist and anti-war grounds.]

***

GO DOWN FIGHTING !

Radical Socialists DO NOT capitulate to opportunist pressures. Radical Socialists do not vote for liberal capitalist politicians and parties that openly boast their rejection of socialist values. Radical Socialists vote for Radical Socialists. For Radical Socialists capitalist elections are simply an opportunity to propagandise against the capitalist political-economy and agitate for revolutionary social and economic transformation.

THE GOAL of Radical Socialists is to extend democracy beyond the political into the social and economic sphere. Radical Socialists know perfectly well that even if they where to ''win'' the popular vote thay would not be allowed to take office in a capitalist state. Radical Socialists know that a vote for liberal capitalists -like John Kerry- will do NOTHING to bring about Radical Socialism - a victory for the neo-liberals only means that the capitalist system of plunder, imperialism, racism and exploitation gets a ''democrat''make over. Lipstick on a pigs face. 

THERE IS NO SOCIALIST CASE FOR KERRY.

Kerry is a political free-loader and an opportunist. His own supporters admit that he is a liar. Kerry defends the occupation of Iraq. He voted for the war. Kerry defends the blocade against Cuba. Kerry defends the anti- Palestinian policies of the Israeli State.

Beyond that; Kerry opposes gay marriage, he opposes increasing the minimum wage to a living wage. Kerry and his supporters believe that they are ''entitled'' to take working class people, ethnic minorities, and the left for granted. They believe that your vote ''belongs'' to them. They believe that YOU belong to them. Your vote does not and YOU DO NOT. Your vote belongs to your values. It belongs to the best interests of the working class and all who suffer oppression under global capitalism and imperialism.

A vote for Kerry is NOT in the best interest of the U.S working class. A Kerry victory would make the United States even more dangerous than it is now. A Kerry victory will make it palatable for the plutocracies of Western Europe to ''join in'' in the plunder of Iraq and central Asia. 

Send the ''democrats'' a message that you are not fooled.

VOTE SOCIALIST. 

VOTE NADER. 

A socialist program for jobs, education, health care ...

Stop the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan! Withdraw all US troops now! ...

- i.c.